“Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties.”
― John Milton, Areopagitica
The Indian Constitution, since its inception, granted its citizens a fundamental right of freedom of speech and expression.The constitution has made it clear that this freedom is not absolute and comes with riders, and that is the way it should be. But, this six-decade old country, the world's largest democracy, has neither been able to ensure that this freedom is used in the true spirit nor been able to protect those that use it in its true sense. Rather, this freedom seems to have become the domain of the political class, who can not only say what they wish to and get away with it but also dictate what people should and should not express; while the common man is left fearing for his safety, even with a casual remark on a social networking site. The problem is that this freedom has been granted without deciding who its custodians are and what can and cannot be said.Who will decide the limitations, scope and act as a guardian for this very basic right?
"I believe in freedom of speech, but I believe we should also have the right to comment on freedom of speech." - Stockwell Day
Sample this. After the 2008 terrorist attacks in Mumbai, The Chief Minister of Kerala (with reference to Major Sandip Unnikrishnan, who laid down his life fighting those terrorists) retorted that "not even a dog would have visited the house'' had it not been the martyr's. Does this not come under the riders that the constitution mentions? Who will take action against him? Who will categorically decide that he should face some action for this remark.
“Freedom of speech does not protect you from the consequences of saying stupid shit.”
― Jim C. Hines
On the other hand, when eminent journalist Shobha De casually tweeted, “Maharashtra and Mumbai??? Why not? Mumbai has always fancied itself as an independent entity, anyway. This game has countless possibilities.”; Congressman Rane retorted: “Rather than twitter, Shoba De shud say the same thing on the streets of Mumbai openly after which she won’t be left with any ‘shoba’(means Dignity) forever.” Threats were made against her life and many political activists attacked her home.“This lady will not back down”, replied Shobha De. Very brave of her, but she is a powerful and popular face and can manage private security; just imagine a common man in place of Shobha De. Who would have come to his/her rescue, when even the chief Minister of Maharashtra, instead of providing security and defending freedom of speech, blatantly remarked “Such comments are unacceptable”.
"Freedom of speech is always under attack by Fascist mentality, which exists in all parts of the world, unfortunately." - Lawrence Ferlinghetti
The problem with this country is that political parties abuse this freedom but then, cannot tolerate non-violent expressions of opinion. How else do you explain the arrest of cartoonist Aseem Trivedi (infact, charged with sedition) for higlighting corruption, while Congress Politician Digvijay Singh does not need to worry at all about calling a fellow party worker "a 100 % tunch maal (means 100% sexy woman)" in front of thousands of people in a rally. The political class has, leaving behind all shame, started using freedom of speech as a tool to ban books, films, cartoons etc. which it deems go against it, by using terms like "hurting religious sentiments", "causing damage to national fabric" and "causing sectarian violence". To put it plainly, everyone should shut up, while politicians say what they want, without restraint or fear of consequences.
This is a nation that cannot protect its girls from rapes, it only expresses grief at such heinous acts; but it is prompt enough to arrest a girl who posts her displeasure at the closing down of a city due to the death of a partisan politician, and then arrests another girl for 'liking' that post. We forced into exile creative maestros like Salman Rushdie, Taslima Nasreen and M.F. Hussain in the name of 'hurting religious sensibilities' but do nothing against Praveen Togadia, Akbaruddin Owaisi and Raj Thackeray who deliver hate speeches day in and day out. Films like Vishwaroopam and Madras Cafe are banned by certain state governments despite being cleared by the censor board, despite an order by courts that inability to control reactions of people by a government is no reason to ban a movie or a book. This year, India ranked a lowly 140th out of 179 countries in the Reporters Without Borders Press Freedom Index and nations like Afghanistan and Qatar have a freer press than India.
“"Freedom is fundamentally the possibility of standig on a street corner and shouting “There is no freedom here!”
― Yoani Sánchez
India, as a nation, is becoming more and more intolerant of contrary perspectives.There is an urgent need to raise voices or soon, we will become a nation of head- nodding conformists rather than the active thinkers that we have always been. With freedom comes power and with power, comes responsibility. We cannot let this dual resultant be taken away from us or be shamelessly abused by political satraps.
“If freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.”
― George Washington
“If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.”
― George Orwell